The W.H.O. and the suppression of basics. Has this resulted in a massive number of people who did not have to die earlier? Vitamin D part 1, reduction in breast cancer incidence.
Fixed hyperlinks version - please re-explore
Subtsack Post 001 – The WHO and the suppression / non-use of basics, has this resulted in a large number of people who did not have to die earlier? Is this another reason we must EXIT the WHO and does this give more impetus as to why we should? The more you learn of vitamin D, you start to ask why didn’t the WHO in its role, since it started ( 1948), raise the levels of vitamin D. There is significant efficacy data available even before WW2 that vitamin D had huge health benefits.
Vitamin D part 1
Can we trust the W.H.O. ( WHO World health organisation) They have done such a poor job with covid? Have their actions had effects going back much further and brought us to the situation we are in today?
THE POINT OF THIS SUBSTACK is to question why something that could have made such a massive difference in preventative health care, poses the following question. Why has this been ignored by the W.H.O. for many decades, even though it looks like it meant a lot of people died earlier than need be due to this action?
They are 84% funded by pharma. Has that caused a conflict of interest caused them to either knowingly or unknowingly not look at many facets of basic health care.
The WHO and our governments are doing something so shocking in silence with no media coverage which will affect all mankind forever, nothing will be the same. At the very least there has been 17.5 months of 18 months of silence on the next step in these changes. People need to act and stop this. Does the data below make you want to trust them?
I am going to outline the massive opportunity COST in lives and positive health outcomes with studies on Vitamin D from this. It indicates a massive number of people who died early than they should have. The figures indicate 15 million lives over 30 years.
Let’s gets straight to the calculation, which I don’t claim is 100% the right way to this, but it definitely shows we have a massive problem, and need to be discussed and indicates an order of magnitude, that’s truly disturbing.
Vitamin D at 150 nmol/l ( 60 ng/ml) lessened the incidence of breast and colon cancer by 80% and many other cancer and diseases. We will focus on breast cancer, here.
The study is listed below that support this, and there are more than these . Lower levels showing more incidence
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0199265 Vitmain D 80% reduction in breast cancer incidence.
https://www.grassrootshealth.net/blog/breast-cancer-80-lower-higher-vitamin-d-60-ng-ml-part-2/
So, let’s get to the numbers, and these may not be spot on, but it shows the order of magnitude, and we would be in the zone.
In Australia in 2021, 3138 people died of breast cancer. Section 8 https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-in-australia-2021/data
Australia is about 1/300th of the world population, actually about 1/307th.
Let’s extrapolate that over 30 years.
The world population was about 5.5 billion 30 years ago, and is 8 billion now.
Thus, the average is 6.76 billion of , or 84%, so that a multiplication of 0.84
We have 80% less incidence at the 150 nmol / 60 ng/ml level, so that’s a multiplication factor of 0.8
I know that Australia has high cancer rates in general so I have a conciliatory reduction multiplication factor of 80% or 0.8 for this.
This calculation results in a number of
3138 x307 x 30 x 0.84 x 0.8 x 0.8 = 15.537 million people
Did they, due to the lack of vitamin D supplementation & insufficient levels needlessly die earlier than they could have, what do you think? The required levels can be achieved at such low cost and are simple to achieve?
Due you think this is a crime against humanity and should every member of the WHO going back decades be held accountable? This is such obvious preventative healthcare, what do you think?
In the next posts we will apply the same to colon cancer, pancreatic cancer and heart disease. If 15 million people dying earlier than need be seems disturbing, wait till we add these. Everywhere you look at the data on vitamin D, the situation gets worse.
Is this analysis method right, I am not 100% sure and I am open to discussion. Its why I reduced them 20% as conciliation factor. But on just 1 disease over 30 years if incidence and death rates are proportional, that’s a monumental massive number.
The number above is monumental and HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT. Compare that to other major events with large death tolls.
How can governments and authorities be so silent on the WHO IHR regulations and the WHO CA+ initiatives when this body looks like it has sacrificed so much life for the profits of it Pharma patrons. How can they want to give the WHO more power, if the above is correct?
Should the world be demanding the abolition of the WHO immediately and investigative tribunals worldwide in every state and country. WHO are our W.H.O delegates who for many decades have overlooked this and fixated on vaccines and now mRNA gene therapies. Do you think we need answers from them, in a public forum?
Please read , assess and make your own judgements. Please pass on if you think the data present here is of merit , even if it needs further clarification and analysis. Do you think we have major problem in health and its regulation? I know there maybe some further mitigating factors , however the effect will still be of a massive magnitude, even if there is further mitigation.
Its appears that Vitamin D is essential to our immune systems to function and how can our health system be so oblivious to this. As I said in letters to government people are few years back are our RDA levels for vitamin D to low? So low, is it criminally low and this assessment would bear that out.
If our health systems has been compromised on 1 health basic, what happens when we look at several basics. What happens when we add the other cancers and heart disease in the graph to this total.
Plus, we have not even brought into this calculation the many millions of “mastectomies” that would not have been needed, plusthe chemo and radiation therapies not needed. How can we have such a health system, what do you think?
Do the problems with the W.H.O go back to the beginning?
Regards
Other Covid related data that makes the above worse.
It gets worse when you think that 125 nmol/l ( 50 ng/ml ) would have led to almost Zero covid and I have seen data even from 2 discussions of how massive reductions getting severe covid and dying from it even starts at 75 nmol/L ( 30 ng/ml). Read assess and make your own judgements.
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/10/3596 50 ng/l and covid is practically zero,
COVID-19 Mortality Risk Correlates Inversely with Vitamin D3 Status, and a Mortality Rate Close to Zero Could Theoretically Be Achieved at 50 ng/mL 25(OH)D3: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
-http://www.orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v16n34.shtml Vitamin D > 75 nmol/l
- http://www.orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v16n49.shtml More info revised 3 months later. A flu study on bolus doses for this respiratory disease . This in 2020 before the inoculations, and that it should help with covid, and below showed it did when used.
- A paper showing bolus doses did help with covid in ICU’s.
https://www.globalissues.org/news/2021/05/06/27755
Vitamin D massive reduction in ICU need with acute covid...
WHO Changes links.
https://australiaexitsthewho.com/
https://thelightaustralia.com/ Uncensored News issue 7
https://thelightpaper.co.uk/ Uncensored News
WHO Double danger - Dr John Campbell and Lawyer Philip Krause
https://rumble.com/v2s3l6c-eu-parliament-covid-summit-iii-dr.meryl-nass-and-dr.-kat-lindley-2023.html Just 9 minutes, if you care about your freinds and family.
If you like what you have read, consider maybe funding a coffee on ko-fi.