UNITED NATIONS - Is there a massive problem - Feb 12, 2018 Article SUN UK Massive sexual abuse + UN control of the internet? W.H.O as example.
In Feb 2018 the SUN UK published an article by former senior United Nations official Andrew Macleod and handed over to DFID Secretary Priti Patel in 2018.
Any use of copyright I acknowledge the original author is Tom Newton Dunn, SUN UK and it’s being quoted for fair dealing and fair use purposes for information and educational purposes only. The author is fully acknowledged in the image below and I have a link to the full article that I hope people will read and go to the source article, as I want you to read the original article as it deserves notice. Plus the related links are at the bottom.
We will start with the Headline & first paragraph, and the links. It was reported in other places at the same time. (link to those at the bottom). One would think this would have been FRONT PAGE & EVENING NEWS Worldwide for a while. Do you think this is a major story and needs a lot more coverage? Was it buried?
https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/10/1142057
BOMBSHELL UN DOSSIER
UN aid workers raped 60,000 people as it’s claimed organisation employs 3,300 paedophiles
Published: 22:00, 12 Feb 2018
Updated: 20:22, 13 Feb 2018
A WHISTLE blower has claimed UN staff could have carried out 60,000 rapes in the last decade as aid workers indulge in sex abuse unchecked around the world.
The claim is in a bombshell dossier that former senior United Nations official Andrew Macleod handed over to DFID Secretary Priti Patel last year.
On similar issues of this type, people still ask why have none of Epsteins or Maxwell's associates been arrested. Do you see this article in the same vein as these two aforementioned people, what do you think? Was very substantial action taken, were any arrested, what do you think should happen, should people be approaching all UN representatives from their own nation?
We seem to have massive media control of anything in the UN with Health and climate and other major issues like this too. The UN would like to be a major part of controlling what we see on the internet, can we trust them as fair arbiters, or will they be censors? It discloses a major issue we should all be informed about and what has happened since. How can we trust such a body if incredibly serious issues like this are shoved under the rug, should the whole place be abolished, what do you think?
PLEASE READ THE ARTICLE IN THE ABOVE LINK and those related at the VERY BOTTOM. This covers sexual abuse of children but does not cover women. It’s also about aid workers. Do these terms include peacekeepers or are there more and bigger problems there? Given the unlimited power the UN and governments want to give the WHO and have been silent about for 3-4 years, what problems could be brought right to our doorsteps? Our media and government have been silent on this.
Can we trust the UN on any level, is it doing any good and should it be abolished, what do you think? The fact that criticism of it on such a major point has all but disappeared is of concern. Especially if it wants to have a lot of control over the internet and information.
https://www.techpolicy.press/the-un-wants-more-say-over-the-future-of-the-internet-thats-not-necessarily-a-good-thing/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrydownes/2012/08/09/why-the-un-is-trying-to-take-over-the-internet/ Effotts starting 10 years ago
The W.H.O. ( World Health Organisation) an agency of the WHO, AS PART TOF ALL THE CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS IT TRIED TO BRING IN, AND FRANKLY GIVEN THE SILENCE ON THOSE FOR 3+ YEARS BY 190+ NATIONS, WHO REALLY KNOW WHAT WAS PASSED recently in mid this year, given all the push back they got from a very small percentage of the world population, and thye continue to press on in silence with no major media/public consultation and debate.
Is this not just a betrayal by the UN and WHO, but most Governments in the world, with no public discussion on all forms of major media?
In Australia, this is especially true as we had the VOICE Referendum last year and the government spent hundreds of millions promoting it, but nothing on the WHO.
The silence is deafening and also shows a betrayal of the trust of the nation, all nations.
The WHO changes, if the majority does not wake up will destroy the world they have always known. All thye care for won’t have a bright future. It will be used as a tool to bring in what Orwell said, “picture a jackboot on a human face forever”. It will be intertwined with forcing people into a form of serfdom, with it being used as a tool to force us into digital ID, digital cashless banking, carbon credits, and tracking. Remember the UN is in bed with the World Economic Forum which said in 2017 that by 2030 you will own nothing and somehow be happy. Even if you do not even know what the WEF stands for the World Economic Forum, then you need to find out as you are doing an injustice to all those you care for remaining in ignorance of their global agenda. They are backed by the wealth that owns the 1000+ biggest companies in the world. The WEF see the majority as useless eaters.
The UN would also want the WHO to control climate and health emergencies. Under the guise of the WHO, the globalist elements in our governments will beray so many and let the WHO make the decision thye also agree with and all the loss of freedoms they will bring, but they dont want to have to look us in the eye and admit that to their citizens.
The government would hand over all control to the UN, and that could involve the UN troops. A few years ago we agreed foreign troops could be allowed into Australia,
Do you want the UN and WHO ( that has complete immunity for their actions since their creation) to have control of people in Australia with unlimited power that is what our government and many others are trying to give them and drive you with fear like covid.
This could be seconding our police forces or an army and rebadging them as UN. Or bringing in their staff and even peacekeepers who have such an abysmal record of sexual abuse and other infractions. Plus under the WHO they have immunity. Do you think people give this much leeway, and won’t abuse it? Plus we have had our state government in Australia allow a lot of recent foreigners to join their forces, so if brought under this umbrella, many may have little respect for the people of the nation, as thye have little connection to it, or is that the purpose?
They want to give the WHO complete control over health and climate emergencies that they decided on and NO CAN QUESTION. By this, they want to divert attention away from the nation’s government who in effect want all of this too but want the appearance of shifting the blame to the UN and WHO.
Does it sound like a long-term plan coming to fruition for the new world order, central government? But now we can talk about but maybe not far into the future.
Just for starters if you want more info click on these links, if you have no idea what has been done in silence for 3+ years.
https://www.porthedland.wa.gov.au/video-library/council-meetings.html Meeting 11th of October special meeting, and why people need to be the media and let expose the contamination of DNA in lip nanoparticles not checked and injected in 15+ million Australians and 5+ billion worldwide. If the UN/WHO does not care about this or being open about sexual abuse do we need them or can we trust them? The trust the world puts in them is misplaced as in the long term their aims are negative for the majority of the wrold.
https://www.standupnowaustralia.com.au/ Lots of information
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/who-virtual-roundtable/ See what did not make the front page. The World Health Organization is ushering in an unprecedented global takeover of public health under the guise of “pandemic preparedness.” Scroll down to a lot of information.
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/exit-the-who
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/100-reasons
Why am I bringing the WHO up with the UN, is because the UN as part of all these changes would put total control of health and climate emergencies, many of which look to be more planned than not, in the hands of the WHO. Plus control of the information. Not think about how nearly every major government is attempting to bring in Mis and Dis-information
Most governments and the UN for 3+ years have been in secret trying to keep out of the media the most draconian regulation to subjugate the rest, and that is not an understatement.
Most governments are trying to have the appearance that so-called health experts are in charge of the next pandemic, sorry plandemic, who have missed so many basics in the last 70+ years and are 84% FUNDED BY PHARMA, OF THAT 25% IS THE GATES FOUNDATION. You only have to see my 6 parts on vitmain D, to see how easily their role is questioned, and that is the tip of a very big iceberg.
You see how strange it is to view the UN and its agency the W.H.O. as pure humanitarian organisations when so much information shows thye are about draconian social control agendas. Can we trust the Un would have workers that could bring more harm than good?
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/un-staff-responsible-for-60-000-rapes-in-a-decade-c627rx239
https://variety.com/2023/digital/news/instagram-pedophile-network-child-pornography-researchers-1235635743/ About how social media is used by abusers.
Links to over 30 videos on the WHO, COVID and more. These were on a leaflet last year.
https://qr-codes.io/2uHi3EPVv6f WHO Immunisation schedule page 10, 500 vaccines probably all mRNA by 2030. So much to look forward to.
https://qr-codes.io/2tIno7lHQvX Names and websites to search on?
https://qr-codes.io/2HbuWUUnX9f Pandemic Video's - Set 1
https://qr-codes.io/4C9OYeqlzqw Who Pandemic Treaty video set 2
https://qr-codes.io/56pd5FccrWC WHO Pandemic Treaty, why was this not front page news?
If you like what you have read, consider maybe funding a coffee on ko-fi.