Vitamin D- Part 2, The W.H.O. and the suppression of basics. How many tens of millions did not have to die earlier? Reduction in colon cancer and heart disease added to breast cancer incidence.
Hyperlinks fixed, please re-explore
Subtsack Post 002 – The WHO and the suppression / non-use of basics, has this resulted in a large number of people who did not have to die earlier? Is this another reason we must EXIT the WHO and does this give more impetus as to why we should?
Vitamin D part 2 - The result is 99 million to 124 million people that did not have to die earlier if they had the right vitamin D level, on breast and colon cancer + heart disease, over 30 years ( Just 3 diseases). Do you think the WHO and health people worldwide who are fixated on vaccines and pharma have lot to answer for?
Do you think we trust the W.H.O. ( World health organisation) They have done such a poor job with covid, and it looks like they have done a bad job for along or maybe since the WHO started and brought us to the situation we are in today?
If you missed Post 001 here it is
https://freespeechisfreedom.substack.com/p/the-who-and-the-suppression-of-basics
This post shows the calculation and assumptions and factors used to extrapolate the reduction in earlier death numbers, if the right level of Vitamin D was used. This was for breast cancer and it was more than 15 million over 30 years, worldwide, based on extrapolated Australian figures , averaging world population factor over 30 years so we have real population extrapolation figure and reducing that by 20% to allow for possible mitigating factors. We have assumed incidence reduction and death reduction are directly proportional. What is shown in the chart below is truly mind boggling ,when you grasp the efficacy of Vitamin D.
Find the time to do some hours or days on research on Vitamin D. Then consider if you need a new health practitioner. Can the right D levels keep you away from them and out of hospital, as you are putting your life in the hands of people who seem to have missed something very big that could have massively helped you and others ?
So, let’s get to the numbers, and these may not be spot on, but it shows the order of magnitude, and we would be in the zone. The zone is scary. In the mid 1907’s 25 deaths in the USA from the swine flu vaccine and it was topped. Now million don’t matter to the system
We have 5295 colon cancer deaths per year in Australia, with this same methodology this figure comes out at 19.9 -23.3 million people who did not need to die earlier ( 60-70 % less incidence band)
Ischaemic Heart disease https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/causes-death-australia/latest-release in 2022 was 19,858 people , in 2020 it was 16, 587 people, 2021 it was 17300 Heart, stroke and vascular disease: Australian facts, Coronary heart disease - Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (aihw.gov.au). I HAVE USED THE LOWED YEAR 2019 TO EXTRAPOLATE
Let’s be kind, on the same basis with 20% conciliation factor. , we get a number of 86 million possible preventable deaths over 30 years from proper vitamin d levels for heart disease ( based from the graph of 50% reduction in incidence at >75 nmol/l - (30 ng/ml)It could be more but data does not go that far and would be an estimate about this. If we use other studies, we get 35% So that give us range of 60-86 million people who did not have to die earlier.
THE TOTAL, WITH BREAST AND COLON CANCER & THE HEART DISEASE IS 99-124 MILLION PEOPLE WHO DID NOT HAVE TO DIE EARLIER over 30 years, if vitamin D levels had been correct. Is the WHO doing its job?
IT GETS WORSE IN POST 003 AND 004.
Is this analysis method right, I am not 100% sure and I am open to discussion. “It’s why I reduced them by 20% as conciliation factor”, THIS IN FACT MAY NOT BE NEEDED.
Whatever mitigating factor there are you will end up with something huge and several times the population of Australia. The total is casualty and death number that happens from a very bad event, like a WORLD WAR.
The number above is monumental and HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT. Compare that to other major events with large death tolls ( that the subject of future post and what event can we use to define a unit of massive horror to compare this too).
How can governments and authorities be so silent on the WHO IHR regulations and the WHO CA+ initiatives when this body looks like it has sacrificed so much life for the profits of its Pharma patrons. How can they want to give the WHO more power, if the above is correct?
Should the world be demanding the abolition of the WHO immediately and investigative tribunals worldwide in every state and country. WHO are our W.H.O delegates who for many decades have overlooked this and fixated on vaccines and now mRNA gene therapies. Do you think we need answers from them, in a public forum?
Please read , assess and make your own judgements. Please pass on if you think the data present here is of merit , even if it needs further clarification and analysis. Do you think we have major problem in health and its regulation? I know there may be some further mitigating factors , however the effect will still be of a massive magnitude, even if there is further mitigation.
Its appears that Vitamin D is essential to our immune systems to function and how can our health system be so oblivious to this.
Do the problems with the W.H.O go back to the beginning? Should we have trials far beyond what did at Nuremberg in WW2
Regards
WHO Changes links.
https://australiaexitsthewho.com/
https://thelightaustralia.com/ Uncensored News issue 7
https://thelightpaper.co.uk/ Uncensored News
WHO Double danger - Dr John Campbell and Lawyer Philip Krause
https://rumble.com/v2s3l6c-eu-parliament-covid-summit-iii-dr.meryl-nass-and-dr.-kat-lindley-2023.html Just 9 minutes, if you care about your friends and family.
If you like what you have read, consider maybe funding a coffee on ko-fi.
The attack on vitamin D started in the 1970s with the villification of the sun. Advising people to slather on sunscreen without compensating for the resultant vitamin D starvation caused the explosion of autoimmune and cardiovascular disease epidemic than has ensued. The immune system “runs” on vitamin D, without adequate amounts the immune system can’t differentiate self from non-self resulting in immune attack on healthy tissue, aka autoimmune disease. The system attacked probably is related to an idiosyncratic genetic weak link. Get your vitamin D optimized to 60-100 ng/ml...around 8000-10,000 IU vitamin D3 per day.
"Missed" or deliberately "blinded"?! I've side my research on vitamin D. In so convinced of its significant value that I'm literally flying somewhere sunnier tomorrow morning, for a few days, just for the purpose of synthesising some of the natural stuff since I am not convinced of the effectiveness of supplementation. Going forward, I only plan to holiday in the winter.