Vitamin D- Part 3, The W.H.O. and the suppression of basics. How many tens of millions did not have to die earlier? Vitamin D defies death, 16% death reduction, 2010 study from this essential nutrient
Hyperlinks fixed, please re-explore.
Vitamin D part 3 - From posts 001 and 002 we had calculations with a result that 99 million to 124 million people that did not have to die earlier if they had the right vitamin D level, on breast and colon cancer + heart disease, over 30 years ( Just 3 diseases).
Part 001
https://freespeechisfreedom.substack.com/p/the-who-and-the-suppression-of-basics
Part 002
https://freespeechisfreedom.substack.com/p/vitamin-d-part-2-the-who-and-the
So, if the W.HO., who is supposedly our supreme global body for the best health for mankind, don’t you think it would be interested in something that could reduce DEATH ( The Grim Reaper) by a median of 16%, if it was doing its job.
NAME ONE PRODUCT FROM PHARMA that has done this. I don’t think anything has ever come close to even 10% of an effect this positive. What do you think? How much less would pharma revenues be, if our we had appropriate levels of this nutrient.
This miracle essential nutrient is Vitamin D. Its results in ANOTHER STAGGERING NUMBER of people who died earlier than need be.
THE STUDY
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20352622/ an estimate of the economic burden and premature deaths due to Vitamin D deficiency in Canada. The abstract is just incredible.
Why didn’t the W.HO. run with this and get our levels up to this level where our immune systems obviously must be function well. Is this inaction, a criminal action on a worldwide scale, what do you think? At minimum do you see it as gross negligence?
So, would it have been higher than this 16% death reduction, with a higher 150 nmol/l ( 60 ng/ml) level where breast cancer incidence is reduced by 80% , colon cancer 70% and heart issues 35-50% ?
Its seems logical our lifespans would have increased if death rates fell by 16%, not decreasing as they are now after the Covid inoculations.
Abstract
The objective of this work is to estimate the economic burden and premature death rate in Canada attributable to low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels. Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to many diseases and conditions in addition to bone diseases, including many types of cancer, several bacterial and viral infections, autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Canadians have mean serum 25(OH)D levels averaging 67 nmol/L. The journal literature was searched for papers reporting dose-response relationships for vitamin D indices and disease outcomes. The types of studies useful in this regard include randomized controlled trials, observational, cross-sectional, and ecological studies, and meta-analyses. The mortality rates for 2005 were obtained from Statistics Canada. The economic burden data were obtained from Health Canada. The estimated benefits in disease reduction were based on increasing the mean serum 25(OH)D level to 105 nmol/L. It is estimated that the death rate could fall by 37,000 deaths (22,300-52,300 deaths), representing 16.1% (9.7-22.7%) of annuals deaths and the economic burden by 6.9% (3.8-10.0%) or $14.4 billion ($8.0 billion-$20.1 billion) less the cost of the program. It is recommended that Canadian health policy leaders consider measures to increase serum 25(OH)D levels for all Canadians.
The study shows that in 2010 the death rate would fall at median of 37000 Canadians.
How many people die each year, let’s go back to the world before the Covid inoculations, before where we had the cure that was vastly worse than the disease.
Two sources listed at the end give us 59 million deaths for 2019 and one source 69 million for 2022. A report I have seen put the deaths from the covid inoculations at > 17 million. This sort of data’s lends credence to that report.
Using the 2019 figures we have
59 million deaths 30 years x 0.84 ( averaging the world population over 30 years)
x 0.16 ( for 16%) fall in death rate
= 237 million people who did not have to die earlier, over 30 years. The study for 105 nmol/L has a range of 9% to 22.7% and the median is 16%
9% gives us 133 million death reduction and 22.7% gives us 336 million death reduction over 30 years. Plus, how much healthier would we have been and had a far better quality of life.
Has Pharma ever delivered one safe product with near zero side effects that improved life this much?
NO is the answer, not even remotely close.
Could this be much larger with 150 nmol/l versus 105 nmol/L levels and lots of other basics we have not explored, studied and calculated
The right levels of Vitamin D seem to deliver longer, healthier life into old age.
Plus, how many could have vastly better lives in far better health with far less suffering?
How many fewer doctors’ visits and hospitals would we have needed, that cost saving to society even in even just monetary terms over 30 years , could it have been in the $trillions?
The questions is where was the WHO and the health system/industry, and why did they not adopt and recommend higher vitamin D levels. Maybe some were ignoring it to maximise profits for their Pharma patrons and other who knew no better doing it unknowingly. Some of that come from the indoctrination of health people during their education with the Pharma based narrative.
Remember in Subtsack 001 we also brought up for breast cancer there would be another large number in the many millions of women who would not have had mastectomies, chemo or suffering. This improvement in life effects will probably be massive overall and we need some really top-notch statisticians / actuarial people to get onto calculating this.
What is shown in the chart below is truly mind boggling ,when you grasp the efficacy of Vitamin. How to put a number on the unnecessary earlier deaths, improved life on to the diseases just in the chart below?
1 ng/ml = 2.5 nmol/L
THE TOTAL, WITH BREAST AND COLON CANCER & THE HEART DISEASE IS 99-124 MILLION PEOPLE WHO DID NOT HAVE TO DIE EARLIER over 30 years, if vitamin D levels had been correct. Is the WHO doing its job? ( from post 002)
I promised it would get worst in post 003.
So, we have the 99-124 million from the posts 001 and 002
Now we see with at a lower Vitamin D level a median of 237 million people who did not have to die earlier.
I think posts 001 and 002 and the data sources show that the study in 2010 was probably understating the positive effect, from 105 nmol/l of Vitamin D and we have other data from 150 nmol/L and should we assume an increase in positive effects.
Plus, I don’t this this was exhaustive study. It’s a study that indicates the world should have massively raised Vitamin D levels, and put billions into more research.
Maybe even free vitamin D supplementation worldwide, as we would have saved massive amounts on healthcare and got a new direction for health. If this had been done, I am prepared to argue that covid would have been a NON-EVENT, and the covid inoculations and the harm they caused would not have happened and we would not have needed them, as our immune systems would have been much better. I have data to back-up that position. Even low levels of vitamin D have massive impact with the flu and studies on bolus doses show how even with acute severe flu, vitamin D shots make a massive difference.
I have data that shows when bolus doses ( large) where given to Covid patients that made massive difference to outcomes. We bring up HCQ and Ivermectin and know they work, but what if we had all gotten our immune systems functioning with Vitamin D, if it can help nuke the chance of getting majors cancer by sometimes 80%, it would have slammed covid. Here is meta study that says it did. Plus, there is data before any injections it would have been done so.
“ https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/10/3596 50 ng/l and covid is practically zero, COVID-19 Mortality Risk Correlates Inversely with Vitamin D3 Status, and a Mortality Rate Close to Zero Could Theoretically Be Achieved at 50 ng/mL 25(OH)D3: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis “
The disease incidence graph we view above, indicates much higher levels of people who did not need to die earlier, that we have calculated.
The benefits levels on 1 essential basic are looking to be stratospheric. Why was it ignored for so long.
Health people says vitamins are expensive urine, do you think they are right to wrong, when you look at this data? Do you think you can trust them once you have seen this data?
How much less pharma, doctors, hospital and suffering we would had with the proper vitamin D levels and we have not even got onto the other basics. You can see we are building up to massive levels of ignorance, negligence ,malfeasance and corruption.
“Is 150 nmol/l or 60 ng/ml the Vitamin D level all mankind, should be aiming for, what do you think?”
Whatever mitigating factor there are you will end up with A RESULT THAT IS HUGE and several times the population of Australia. Is the total in death numbers and casualties more like those that happens from a very bad event or events, like more than one WORLD WAR.
The number above is monumental and HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT.
How can governments and authorities be so silent on the WHO IHR regulations and the WHO CA+ initiatives?
How can they want to give the WHO more power, if the above is correct?
Should the world be demanding the abolition of the WHO immediately and investigative tribunals worldwide in every state and country. WHO are our W.H.O delegates who for many decades have overlooked this and fixated on vaccines and now mRNA gene therapies. Do you think we need answers from them, in a public forum?
Please read , assess and make your own judgements. Please pass on if you think the data present here is of merit , even if it needs further clarification and analysis. Do you think we have major problem in health and its regulation? I know there may be some further mitigating factors , however the effect will still be of a massive magnitude, even if there is some mitigation.
Its appears that Vitamin D is essential to our immune systems to function and how can our health system be so oblivious to this.
Do the problems with the W.H.O go back to the beginning? Should we have trials far beyond what did at Nuremberg in WW2
Regards
One future post will have a lot of general links for you to assess and probably sit there in disbelief as to why our levels were not raised. From that should we ask how can the WHO even have right to exit as this shows such massive negligence, what do you think? Remember this is just on ONE basic essential nutrient. Some many more basics that could have helped mankind have been ignored and suppressed.
Death rate links.
https://deadorkicking.com/death-statistics/worldwide/2019/
https://deadorkicking.com/death-statistics/worldwide/2022/
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/number-of-deaths-per-year
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19268496/ European study with good results with lowish Vitmain D levels. Do you think this shows the indoctrination and ignorance of a lot of our science and health.
WHO Changes links.
https://australiaexitsthewho.com/
https://thelightaustralia.com/ Uncensored News issue 7
https://thelightpaper.co.uk/ Uncensored News
WHO Double danger - Dr John Campbell and Lawyer Philip Krause
https://rumble.com/v2s3l6c-eu-parliament-covid-summit-iii-dr.meryl-nass-and-dr.-kat-lindley-2023.html Just 9 minutes, if you care about your friends and family.
If you like what you have read, consider maybe funding a coffee on ko-fi.
CLICK HERE TO BUY ME A CUP OF COFFEE
E&O.E.
Day 3 of my vitamin D synthesis project in Lanzarote - aka winter holiday! Nature is always best. I sit out with the rising sun to prep the skin for max benefit in the midday sun. Not worn suncream in years. Stopped burning after I stopped using it. Honey, beeswax, olive oil, royal jelly, bee pollen and bee propolis for moisture. Add 4 hours of exercise per day. My immune system thanks me!